Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Dragon Ball Ots List Exp X999

Valerio Mattioli for "poor performance"

The Ministry of Defence dismisses Valerio Mattioli for "poor performance"


Valerio Mattioli
With determination of the Ministry of defense, 12 June 2002 the General Directorate of Military Personnel, proposed by the General Command of the Carabinieri, Valerio Mattioli fired for "poor performance" in a letter entitled: "Termination of service learning, for" poor performance, "Valerio MATTIOLI chosen appointment.

In it we read that:


"In accepting the proposal for a permanent termination of service made by the higher authority against the appointed location:

  • The opinions on 03/27/2002 expressed by the Commission of Evaluation and Advancement of the General Command of the Carabinieri, after hearing the pinned chosen MATTIOLI Valerio;
  • examined the documents, with particular reference to:
    a) feature and the documentation of military service;
    b) the documentation submitted by the General Command Carabinieri No Foil ... Omission ... dated April 3, 2002;
    c) the additional documentation submitted by the said General Command Foil No ... omission ... May 15, 2002, in which it is stated also that the lance chosen MATTIOLI Valerio did not explicitly asked to confer with the Director of this Directorate-General, pursuant to Circular No. DGPM/II/5/30001/C42 of 22.5.2000;


  • noted the defensive deductions expressed by the person in the call of the aforementioned Commission of Assessment and Progress;
  • examined together with the documentation produced by the same deductions as well as defensive acts of the investigation filed on April 24, 2002;
  • the regularity of the procedure followed in this proceeding, initiated under the Law 241/90 with a formal act of communication of January 31, 2002, notified on February 5 next,
  • considered anthropogenic investigation showed that the lance MATTIOLI Valerio chosen in recent years has revealed negative professional and personal qualities , being several times and consecutively rated "insufficient", incurring also in disciplinary sanctions for a total of 74 days of delivery of rigor;
  • view of the insensitivity of the military to the repeated warnings of his superiors to improve their performance, indicating a marked lack of interest in the efforts to improve the levels necessary to ensure a sufficient return to service;

you have left the service permanent appointment chosen MATTIOLI Valerio, for poor performance, under Articles. 12, letter c) of Act Oct. 18, 1961, No 1168, as amended by Law 1 February 1989, n. 53 and art. 17 of the said Act No 1168/1961.


The aforesaid shall be immediately vacated military service to qualify for licenses in the supervisor, after which it will be placed on leave unlimited. "



At the end of the holiday period that remained to be eligible, Valerio Mattioli, that act does not benefit from any pension benefit, as of July 4, 2002, was placed on leave because they no longer unlimited authority by the service, after 23 years.





0 comments:

Post a Comment