Time, January 24, 2001, internal page
of the Privacy Appeals to the government after complaints appointment Mattioli
'Stock of the Force, are new laws "
Command will update or delete 95 million Card personal
Stefano Mannucci
Rome - I 95 million "permanent practices' registered to citizens living or dead, associations and bodies, preserved in the archives of the Carabinieri.
to the Privacy, Stefano Rodota, it takes an 'urgent legislative action "and an immediate new internal rules in the system of collection, use and handling of such personal information.
The General Command of the said he was willing to verify, update, store, or possibly destroy all that material, and no later than February 28 is expected to report same to the Guarantor on the measures to be undertaken. The pronouncement
of Rodotà comes after months of investigations by the complaints born of a corporal of the police, Valerio Mattioli, effective control of the Company at the Core of San Giovanni Valdarno, near Arezzo. Mattioli had repeatedly reported the existence of 70 million in public (there are many more, as we have seen) of personal files held in 5000 Carabinieri stations scattered throughout the peninsula.
Mattioli for his statements many times has suffered disciplinary action: an interview published in "Time" on October 5 last year cost him eight days of delivery of rigor, on the grounds that his statements "the prestige ledevano institution and other military and were in breach of the duties relating to their state, in particular the sense of responsibility. "means" stock market crash "at his appointment Command: evaluation of the mirror Mattioli, who first revealed allegations of a framework for 'excellence, suddenly becomes inadequate under "common sense", that assessment was "poor", the "conduct in-service" "bad," and by mouth.
Now the Guarantor acknowledges that the personal battle of the policeman had some reason for being: to Rodotà the weapon would submit to treatment "illegal" data files, but still occur in that archive "irregularities "lacks adequate legal support. Claim as well as the privacy principles introduced by Law 675/96. In addition, according to the Authority, it must operate according to the purposes of distinction, the shipowner, the treatment of those files.
In the case of purely administrative activity (data from legal and economic treatment of personnel, participation in competitions and so on), the Guarantor urges adjustments from a regulatory perspective, while for the "profiling" of certain requirements defense, national security or the prevention, investigation and prosecution of crimes, Rodotà appeals to the government: we need new laws. "base law is insufficient "and the matter is obviously hot.
Mattioli reveals in" Time ":" Most of the local population was entered according to the old criteria (the practice dates back more than half a century ago, ed), including political opinions, religious and kin. All data, compared with one another, were able to reveal the ethnic, racial ....» And again: "Most of the information we provided the people themselves, through the fiduciary relationship is with the weapon. And some of these stories were actually snatched the knowledge of the interlocutors. data that ended up on the personal file of the person concerned and became permanent. Political opinions are the most hateful, because it would penalize the occupation of a child for the ideas he believed his father decades earlier ... ".
the command of the Guarantor then asks, "in a spirit of cooperation", to "establish new and more proportionate terms of data retention," "maintain adequate safeguards with respect to data going back in time, especially as regards as sensitive, the opinions expressed in the past enjoyed the esteem and reputation in public relations and friendly relatives "and" periodically verify compliance with the principles of relevance and non-surplus processed information, including in peripheral structures. Rodotà formula also a reminder of personal information disclosed to the EDC, the Data Processing Centre of the Department of Public Safety. for requiring a "selective update "......
0 comments:
Post a Comment