Speak the appointment that revealed the secret archives of the weapon and now faces the place of
Checchino Antonini
He denounced the existence of immense archives at any police station. A filing mass made in the absence of clear rules and undermine democracy.
By coincidence, just Monday, the day of the launch of the government decrees on "reform" of the Force, Valerio Mattioli appointment was announced the initiation of a procedure for dismissal for "underperformance." "Not for disciplinary reasons, not because I misrepresentation, 'says Mattioli to Liberation.
Forty years, half of which spent in uniform, it is now time to service S. Giovanni Valdarno. For a further coincidence, just ten days ago, the guarantor of privacy had announced an additional investigation into his allegations. With their ongoing investigations, the story resembles a "threat to the officer" that he had requested.
appointment, waiting for such a measure?
In some ways yes, I was warned four times with a letter from the company commander.
Poor performance is heavy charge for those who chose to pursue a particular career ...
In fact, until '96, my notes on the features was given the title of "excellent", the highest mark.
Then what happened?
I saw too many things around to me and I could not shut up. I discovered the existence of the files, my colleagues have confirmed its existence.
When did you decide to come out?
In '97, in a letter to "Times" wrote of a "public non-profit entity" that the listed 70 million Italians. Two years later, I could see a practical command of which contained a note written on it that would not have been taken because the weapon was not mentioned explicitly. In January '98 I had already asked for through the hierarchical command general questions about privacy in the collection of information.
has never been answered?
It was a good time, I was punished several times for various reasons (eg for the currency in disorder). I also did a lot of night-shifts and awkward.
unanswered by the command, decided to do otherwise?
Yes, August 9. '99, I sent priority mail 80 exposed to as many prosecutors, then in May 2000, I sent three exposed to the Guarantor: personal files, the military police (the same Rodotà , in an interview, described a very interesting ed) and Article 225 of the general who speaks of activity socially relevant information about people (politicians, union leaders, judges, journalists, ed.)
What were the reactions of his superiors?
yet been punished, I almost lost count. On October 20, '99, I had three days of penalty for having forwarded the complaint without informing his superiors last August, seven other complaints to the Ombudsman and to have released statements on matters relating to the service.
What is it?
I have always talked about things you already know. A report of the parliamentary committee monitoring the secret services had already identified as illegal UCS activity already in '95, the office that issues security clearances for people and businesses of interest to Defence. Certificates issued after the collection of information made by the police, without clear rules and without the subjects to be aware of any claims on their bad decisions.
was already known that the UCSI operated by secretaries in each ministry for the protection of State secrets, which, however, also collect information on political opinions, religious, sexual, staff at odds with the Workers' Statute. He told a sergeant that what matters more is that adultery can be used for blackmail.
In a parliamentary question last January also Senator Russo Spena had made known the existence of the archives of the weapon. And, if there are reports on the activities of secret services, lack of parliamentarians, from postwar to the present, all information on intelligence by the military police of the police.
If there were such information, what might come to light?
What type of operation is the same as a secret service, the news reports are not substantiated. The files, which are filled by "tissue" anonymous which can be removed at any time and, once implanted, the files are never destroyed.
reform being implemented fails to allay his doubts?
all remain concerns. Back in '93, on "Review of the Carabinieri, a theoretical review, were spelled out the concerns of the high command to ensure them the weapon handover of power (usually attributed to the political authorities) in cases of emergency, and also if dl flood.
0 comments:
Post a Comment